All resources

ISPs are coming. Can AI help you focus on pupils, not paperwork?

6 October 2026
Introduction of the new, statutory Individual Support Plans under the SEND reforms aim to bring welcome clarity and consistency. But unless implementation is carefully designed, ISPs could create a paperwork ripple effect - can AI help?

What ISPs are and why they matter

Individual Support Plans (ISPs) sit at the heart of the government’s proposed SEND reforms. Under the current proposals, every child or young person with SEND would have a digital, living record of their barriers to learning, the provision and reasonable adjustments they require, and their intended outcomes. 

Developed in partnership with children, young people and their families, ISPs would be reviewed at least annually, with their use and quality considered through inspection. The intention is clear: to make support more visible, consistent and transferable as children move between settings.

However, there is a significant challenge that should not be overlooked. Creating a genuine, workable plan for every pupil with SEND involves far more than an administrative compliance exercise. Each plan requires meaningful discussion between all involved, careful drafting, professional oversight, effective communication, implementation, monitoring and regular review. 

When this cycle is repeated for every pupil on the SEN register - and involves pupils and families at the heart of the discussion, along with all the teachers and professionals responsible for delivering the agreed support - the scale of the task becomes clear. Introducing ISPs is therefore not simply an administrative change; it represents a substantial whole-school approach, underpinned by an inclusive culture. 

A plan is not the provision

The key implementation question is not whether schools can produce these plans - they will. Schools are adept at meeting new requirements, and many have been successfully producing similar plans for pupils with SEND under the current system for years.  The more important question is whether schools can create plans that genuinely improve pupils’ experiences and outcomes without taking disproportionate time and attention away from delivering the support itself.

The quality of an ISP cannot be judged by length, presentation or the number of boxes completed. A high-quality plan should place the voice of the child and family at its core. It should make the next action clearer, help a teacher understand the barrier, the adjustment or intervention, who will do what, and how the school will know whether it is helping. 

Where AI can help, and where it shouldn’t

AI can help schools reduce the time spent turning meetings and discussions into clear, usable plans. Trellis, for example, can record a meeting - with everyone’s permission - and use the conversation to produce draft minutes and an initial plan. Staff and parents can then review, edit and improve the draft rather than starting with a blank page.

AI can also help organise information under consistent headings, summarise the contributions of pupils, families and professionals, and highlight details that may need further discussion. This can free up SENCOs and teachers to spend more time listening to families, supporting colleagues and checking that agreed provision is being delivered.

However, AI should support professional judgement rather than replace it. School staff must remain responsible for checking the accuracy of the plan, identifying priorities, agreeing suitable provision, setting meaningful outcomes and deciding who will carry out each action. They must also ensure that the views of the child or young person and their family are recorded accurately and used to inform the plan content. 

The ISP has the potential to strengthen communication between families, schools and wider services. Used appropriately, AI can support this by bringing together contributions from meetings, producing a clear first draft and reducing the time staff spend on administration. However, both the technology and the plan must remain tools for improving provision rather than becoming ends in themselves. 

--

Natalie Packer is a Independent SEND consultant and author of The Perfect SENCO. Former SENCO, primary head, and DfE SEN adviser.

See how Trellis turns a meeting into a draft ISP - book a demo or come and see a demo at TES SEND this Friday and Saturday.

‍

‍

Natalie

More from the blog

October 8, 2026

Does AI offer more than just cutting write-up time?

The benefits of using AI in SEND can’t be judged simply as reduced hours spent on paperwork - the value for SENCOs in getting that time back and the impact on their work with children, families, staff and school leaders goes way beyond this.
Natalie
Does AI offer more than just cutting write-up time?
September 28, 2026

Using your Inclusive Mainstream Fund with Trellis

The Department for Education's new Inclusive Mainstream Fund (IMF) is designed to help mainstream schools strengthen inclusive practice and improve support for pupils with SEND.
Andy
Using your Inclusive Mainstream Fund with Trellis
September 18, 2026

Get Trellis in your school this autumn - new trials in England

We know that writing up SEND meeting minutes and support plans can feel like a full time job on its own - as well as making it harder for you to be fully present with learners and their families.
Andy
Get Trellis in your school this autumn - new trials in England